The Routledge handbook on informal urbanization

Edited by Roberto Rocco and Jan van Ballegooijen

Chapter One: The ideology of informality

Informal Urbanisation

Cabucu, City of Sao Paulo

Why a book on the politics of informal urbanisation?

Many countries in the Global South are relatively young democracies. The resilience and legitimacy of their political systems depends largely on their ability to politically integrate and represent millions of citizens who are currently ‘excluded’ from formal social, political and economic structures. Exclusion from those formal structures has deep-reaching consequences and is reflected on the built environment as well, as many of the so-called excluded live in informal settlements.

Democracy’s success depends not only on the ability of formal institutions to respond to the legitimate demands and rights of its citizens, but it also depends on how these citizens are able to penetrate the political realm in order to claim their rights. In this sense, informal urbanisation is not a solution for lack of housing in developing countries, but a step for the formulation of legitimate demands and to the inclusion of citizens in the realm of politics. By this token, processes of informal urbanisation must lead to an affirmation of civil rights, to the reinforcement of the rule of law, to the inclusion of citizens in formal institutions and processes and must therefore result in the formalisation of the built environment.

The main aim of this book is to investigate the mutual relationship between formal democratic institutions and processes of informal urbanization in different socio-political and cultural settings. It tries to find a middle ground between two opposing perspectives on the political meaning of urban informality. The first, the ‘emancipatory perspective’, frames urban informality as a practice that fosters autonomy, entrepreneurship and social mobility. The other perspective, more critical, sees informality predominantly as a result of political exclusion, inequality and poverty. Is urban informality indeed merely the result of a democratic deficit caused by governing autocratic elites and ineffective bureaucracies? Or do we see urban informality as a fertile breeding ground for bottom-up democracy and more political participation?

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 16 other followers

Summary of the project
The Project
Expectations from editors
The Book
Index
Abstracts
Contributing authors
References
AESOP 2019 Round Table
Who we are

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Post to

Cancel

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy